Skip to main content
CounselO LegalOnline legal consultationsSaudi Arabia
CounselO Legal Saudi ArabiaCountry-specific legal content and servicesChange jurisdiction

Administrative decisions and appeals

Public procurement disputes in Saudi Arabia

Professional online legal support for public procurement disputes in Saudi Arabia. We examine tender conditions, the bid record and exclusion or award reasons, then prepare a procurement objection or response.

Send your matter for review WhatsApp

State the jurisdiction, any urgent date and the outcome you need. Scope and fee are confirmed before paid work begins.

How we help with public procurement disputes

  • Evidence and document review

    Our review covers tender terms and amendments, submitted bid, submission receipt, evaluation or award notice and correspondence. We identify what supports your position and what needs clarification or further evidence.

  • Must bid evaluation follow the published criteria?

    Articles 24–25 of the operative 2019 procurement law require evaluation and acceptance criteria in the tender documents; non-price criteria must be objective and proportionate to the procurement. Compare the disputed score or exclusion reason with those criteria and the bid actually submitted. A lower price alone does not establish entitlement to the award. Locate the issue in tender preparation, eligibility, evaluation, award or contract implementation. Preserve the published requirements and the version of the bid actually submitted. A procurement objection should identify the specific departure alleged and the remedy sought at that stage.

Related content

Latest related articles and work

Legal articles and work related to this service.

Explore the Legal Library

Latest articles

View all articles
Administrative Law

When Can an Administrative Decision Be Annulled?

Review the grounds for challenging a Saudi administrative decision before the Board of Grievances, alongside standing and procedural requirements.

2 min read
Read article

Latest work

View all work
Administrative – Civil Defense violations

Civil Defense Violations Annulled by Court

This case study concerns a decision by the Civil Defense Violations Committee imposing a SAR 60,000 fine on the claimant for violations relating to safety requirements. CounselO Legal analyzed the decision, inspection report, procedures, and committee composition. The strategy focused on the decision’s administrative illegality, particularly the defect in the committee’s composition resulting from the absence of the religious/statutory member required by law. The court annulled the violations decision because it had been issued by an improperly constituted committee, constituting a material formal defect affecting the decision’s validity.

Saudi Arabia

View work sample
Administrative violation – Administrative Court – Cancellation of a violation

Environmental Violations Objection

This case study concerns a company’s objection to environmental violations carrying fines of SAR 145,000. CounselO Legal reviewed the administrative decision, enforcement records, notices, photographs, and documents, focusing on whether the violations were properly attributed to the company and whether the issuing authority had jurisdiction to impose the fine. The analysis identified fundamental defects, most notably that the fine exceeded the competent authority’s jurisdictional limit, together with deficiencies in the enforcement and notification procedures and in proving the site’s connection to the company. The court consequently found the decision defective in jurisdiction, form, and grounds, and ruled to cancel the environmental penalty decision. Conclusion: The case demonstrates that a successful objection requires more than disputing whether a violation occurred; it requires a complete review of the administrative decision’s legality, including jurisdiction, procedures, and evidence.

Saudi Arabia

View work sample
Administrative Litigation Case Study

Study of an Appeal Before the Supreme Administrative Court

A compensation claim that had been ruled inadmissible was reopened. The legal study demonstrated that the compensation claim differed from the earlier claim for contractual entitlements and had not previously been decided. The Supreme Administrative Court accordingly overturned the judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration.

Saudi Arabia

View work sample